Topic summary
50% 1 analyzed article/video 745 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Damages Claims results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 299 hits . Analysis detected 1,674 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 58% (9,310 of 21,812 topics). This Damages Claims is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group. Damages Claims
Topic details
Total words: 2,980
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst