Topic summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video1,937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cybersecurity Threats results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 475 hits. Analysis detected 3,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,811 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,558 of 16,562 topics). This Cybersecurity Threats is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Cybersecurity Threats
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠31%Cybersecurity Threats (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,811
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cybersecurity Threats attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cybersecurity Threats vs sitewide
Cybersecurity Threats attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos