Topic summary
78%2 analyzed articles/videos270 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Customs And Border Protection results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 568 hits. Analysis detected 4,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,768 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 47% (6,605 of 12,450 topics). This Customs And Border Protection is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Customs And Border Protection
Topic details
Total words: 3,768
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Customs And Border Protection attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Customs And Border Protection vs sitewide
Customs And Border Protection attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.