Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Customer Compensation results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Anecdotal, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 277 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,102 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,961 topics). This Customer Compensation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Customer Compensation
Topic details
Total words: 1,102
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos