Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video824 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Courtroom Access results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 247 hits. Analysis detected 2,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 53% (6,154 of 13,019 topics). This Courtroom Access is worse (more manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Courtroom Access
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Courtroom Access attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Courtroom Access vs sitewide
Courtroom Access attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.