Topic summary
29%3 analyzed articles/videos642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Court Hearings results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 1,089 hits. Analysis detected 5,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,174 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (9,253 of 14,310 topics). This Court Hearings is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Court Hearings
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Court Hearings attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Court Hearings vs sitewide
Court Hearings attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.