Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Cost Of Living Adjustments results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Bandwagon as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 205 faulty-reasoning hits from 594 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,640 topics). This Cost Of Living Adjustments is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Cost Of Living Adjustments
Topic details
Total words: 594
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles594 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos