Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,099 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Spending results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 713 hits. Analysis detected 3,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (9,816 of 15,539 topics). This Corporate Spending is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Corporate Spending
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Corporate Spending attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Corporate Spending vs sitewide
Corporate Spending attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.