Topic summary
93%1 analyzed article/video784 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Controversial Statements results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 526 hits. Analysis detected 2,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 68% (5,044 of 15,753 topics). This Controversial Statements is worse (more manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Controversial Statements
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Controversial Statements attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Controversial Statements vs sitewide
Controversial Statements attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.