Topic summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos2,854 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Spending results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 1,226 hits. Analysis detected 12,843 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,855 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 41% (7,688 of 13,018 topics). This Consumer Spending is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Consumer Spending
Topic details
Total words: 11,855
Article count: 5
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Consumer Spending attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Consumer Spending vs sitewide
Consumer Spending attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.