Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Consumer Backlash results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Horn Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 48.3% saturation with 436 hits. Analysis detected 900 faulty-reasoning hits from 902 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,545 topics). This Consumer Backlash is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Consumer Backlash
Topic details
Total words: 902
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles902 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 48.3%48.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 6.4%6.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 48.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Horn Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos