Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,837 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conservative Commentary results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 643 hits. Analysis detected 6,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (11,097 of 17,287 topics). This Conservative Commentary is better (less manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
Conservative Commentary
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Conservative Commentary attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Conservative Commentary vs sitewide
Conservative Commentary attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.