Topic summary
7%3 analyzed articles/videos4,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conservation Biology results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 1,248 hits. Analysis detected 13,594 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,354 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (13,868 of 14,046 topics). This Conservation Biology is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group.
Conservation Biology
Topic details
Total words: 24,354
Article count: 3
Authors
Showing top 48 attributes by prevalence for chart readability.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Conservation Biology attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Conservation Biology vs sitewide
Conservation Biology attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos