Topic summary
68%16 analyzed articles/videos8,211 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Oversight results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 6,925 hits. Analysis detected 55,276 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,994 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 27% (8,974 of 12,186 topics). This Congressional Oversight is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Congressional Oversight
Topic details
Total words: 49,994
Article count: 16
Authors
Showing top 48 attributes by prevalence for chart readability.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Congressional Oversight attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Congressional Oversight vs sitewide
Congressional Oversight attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.