Topic summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video845 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Hearing results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 384 hits. Analysis detected 1,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,535 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,632 of 16,562 topics). This Congressional Hearing is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Congressional Hearing
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠66%Congressional Hearing (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,535
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Congressional Hearing attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Congressional Hearing vs sitewide
Congressional Hearing attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos