Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video

BS Summary: These Congressional Franking Privilege results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 420 hits. Analysis detected 2,247 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,790 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 13,897 topics). This Congressional Franking Privilege is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.

Congressional Franking Privilege

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%
⁠0%	Congressional Franking Privilege (selected)	0%

Topic details

Total words: 2,790

Article count: 1

Authors

Ana Radelat

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Congressional Franking Privilege attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Congressional Franking Privilege vs sitewide

Congressional Franking Privilege attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

How Minnesota members of Congress use taxpayer-funded franking⁠^44%

MinnPost⁠^28%By Ana Radelat⁠^0%7/17/2026, 10:00:00 AM