Topic summary
66%1 analyzed article/video807 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Candidacy results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 618 hits. Analysis detected 2,497 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,421 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,537 of 16,562 topics). This Congressional Candidacy is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Congressional Candidacy
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Congressional Candidacy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Congressional Candidacy vs sitewide
Congressional Candidacy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.