Topic summary
50%1 analyzed article/video653 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Budgeting results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 180 hits. Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,959 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (5,739 of 15,785 topics). This Congressional Budgeting is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Congressional Budgeting
Topic details
Total words: 1,959
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Congressional Budgeting attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Congressional Budgeting vs sitewide
Congressional Budgeting attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.