Topic summary
ā 11%1 analyzed article/video783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Approval results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 643 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,349 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ā 65% (8,807 of 24,545 topics). This Congressional Approval is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Congressional Approval
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,349
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos