Topic summary

⁠28%1 analyzed article/video1,052 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Congressional Appropriations results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 414 hits. Analysis detected 2,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (14,775 of 21,540 topics). This Congressional Appropriations is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group.

Congressional Appropriations

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	4-H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	4 H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	Musician Biographies	1%
⁠0%	Cleveland Politics	1%
⁠0%	Summer Traditions	1%
⁠32%	Congressional Appropriations (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 4,208

Article count: 1

Authors

Jsinnenberg

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Congressional Appropriations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Congressional Appropriations vs sitewide

Congressional Appropriations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

The Trump administration wants $10 million more to cover its July Fourth celebrations⁠^22%

WAMU⁠^34%By Jsinnenberg⁠^37%7/31/2026, 5:28:33 AM