Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video403 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Competitive Eating results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 194 hits. Analysis detected 851 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,612 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,529 of 16,562 topics). This Competitive Eating is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Competitive Eating
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Competitive Eating attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Competitive Eating vs sitewide
Competitive Eating attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.