Topic summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video683 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Comparative Revolutions results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 31.2% saturation with 853 hits. Analysis detected 4,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (3,580 of 21,647 topics). This Comparative Revolutions is worse (more manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group.
Comparative Revolutions
Topic details
Total words: 2,732
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510083.5% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 31.2%31.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 21.4%21.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 10.5%10.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 15.3%15.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 31.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.1%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos