Topic summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video1,251 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Company Downgrade results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hindsight Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 654 hits. Analysis detected 3,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (12,532 of 24,549 topics). This Company Downgrade is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Company Downgrade
Topic details
Total words: 5,004
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.1%5.1%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos