Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Combat Injuries results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 1.3% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 340 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,115 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,545 topics). This Combat Injuries is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Combat Injuries
Topic details
Total words: 5,115
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos