Topic summary
58%1 analyzed article/video562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Transparency Act results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 3,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (2,852 of 16,839 topics). This College Transparency Act is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
College Transparency Act
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
College Transparency Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
College Transparency Act vs sitewide
College Transparency Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.