Topic summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video995 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Sports Legislation results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 2,937 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (11,751 of 23,940 topics). This College Sports Legislation is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
College Sports Legislation
Topic details
Total words: 3,980
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Special Pleading: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos