Topic summary
ā 81%1 analyzed article/video914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Litigation results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 464 hits. Analysis detected 2,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,742 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ā 51% (7,812 of 15,919 topics). This Climate Litigation is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Climate Litigation
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 51%Climate Litigation (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,742
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Climate Litigation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Climate Litigation vs sitewide
Climate Litigation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos