Topic summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video1,289 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clean Energy Policy results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 375 hits. Analysis detected 2,679 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (13,687 of 22,472 topics). This Clean Energy Policy is better (less manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.
Clean Energy Policy
Topic details
Total words: 5,156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.1% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos