Topic summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Classic Film results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 579 hits. Analysis detected 1,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,001 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (7,525 of 24,545 topics). This Classic Film is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Classic Film
Topic details
Total words: 2,001
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 28.9%28.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos