Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,874 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Civilian Harm Mitigation results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 1,047 hits. Analysis detected 9,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (4,795 of 11,454 topics). This Civilian Harm Mitigation is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.

Civilian Harm Mitigation

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Survival Stories	1%
⁠0%	Gender Identity	1%
⁠59%	Civilian Harm Mitigation (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 7,496

Article count: 1

Authors

Nick Turse

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Civilian Harm Mitigation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Civilian Harm Mitigation vs All Other Publications

Civilian Harm Mitigation attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Internal Pentagon Report Reveals Hegseth Is Willfully Putting Civilians in Danger⁠^65%

The Intercept⁠^0%By Nick Turse⁠^0%5/15/2026, 9:33:25 PM