Topic summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civil Rights Leader results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 464 hits. Analysis detected 2,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (5,476 of 22,261 topics). This Civil Rights Leader is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Civil Rights Leader
Topic details
Total words: 2,404
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.4% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.9%5.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.5%11.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 19.3%19.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 7.0%7.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos