Topic summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video1,597 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civil Litigation results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Confirmation Bias, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.2% saturation with 202 hits. Analysis detected 1,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (21,224 of 22,935 topics). This Civil Litigation is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.
Civil Litigation
Topic details
Total words: 6,388
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

8% percentile
02550751007.5% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos