Topic summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Citizen Engagement results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Personal Incredulity, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 146 faulty-reasoning hits from 622 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (4,484 of 24,545 topics). This Citizen Engagement is worse (more manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Citizen Engagement
Topic details
Total words: 622
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.7% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles622 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Personal Incredulity: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos