Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cincinnati Zoo Incident results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 970 faulty-reasoning hits from 952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 77% (2,642 of 11,454 topics). This Cincinnati Zoo Incident is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Cincinnati Zoo Incident
Topic details
Total words: 952
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cincinnati Zoo Incident attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cincinnati Zoo Incident vs All Other Publications
Cincinnati Zoo Incident attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.