Topic summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cincinnati Events results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 460 hits. Analysis detected 1,752 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (10,090 of 22,060 topics). This Cincinnati Events is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Cincinnati Events
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,976
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.5%15.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos