Topic summary
â 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chinese Communist Party results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 513 hits. Analysis detected 5,196 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,833 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 13,026 topics). This Chinese Communist Party is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Chinese Communist Party
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Chinese Communist Party attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Chinese Communist Party vs sitewide
Chinese Communist Party attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.