Topic summary
7%1 analyzed article/video2,588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These China's Economic Strategy results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 935 hits. Analysis detected 5,161 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 6% (11,265 of 11,919 topics). This China's Economic Strategy is better (less manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
China's Economic Strategy
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
China's Economic Strategy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
China's Economic Strategy vs sitewide
China's Economic Strategy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.