Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These China US Relations results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 386 hits. Analysis detected 2,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 13,026 topics). This China US Relations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
China US Relations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Oakland Culture1%
ā 0%Dive Bars1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%China US Relations (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 3,684
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
China US Relations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
China US Relations vs sitewide
China US Relations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos