Topic summary

⁠81%1 analyzed article/video751 analyzed words

BS Summary: These China Russia Relations results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 492 hits. Analysis detected 3,726 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (6,261 of 21,264 topics). This China Russia Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.

China Russia Relations

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	4-H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	4 H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	Musician Biographies	1%
⁠0%	Back-To-School	1%
⁠0%	Cleveland Politics	1%
⁠71%	China Russia Relations (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 3,004

Article count: 1

Authors

Mike Watson

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

China Russia Relations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

China Russia Relations vs sitewide

China Russia Relations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

China’s Gambit in the Gulf⁠^66%

The Washington Free Beacon⁠^93%By Mike Watson⁠^90%8/1/2026, 2:00:27 AM