Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Capitol Reflecting Pool results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 599 faulty-reasoning hits from 614 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,506 topics). This Capitol Reflecting Pool is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Capitol Reflecting Pool
Topic details
Total words: 614
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles614 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.5%21.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.7%26.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 6.5%6.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.9%10.9%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.0%Red Herring: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos