Topic summary
ā 88%1 analyzed article/video689 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cannabis Market Regulation results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 580 hits. Analysis detected 4,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ā 83% (3,372 of 19,150 topics). This Cannabis Market Regulation is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Cannabis Market Regulation
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cannabis Market Regulation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cannabis Market Regulation vs sitewide
Cannabis Market Regulation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.