Topic summary
51%1 analyzed article/video1,126 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cannabinoid Regulation results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Pessimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 469 hits. Analysis detected 3,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 39% (11,653 of 18,952 topics). This Cannabinoid Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Cannabinoid Regulation
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cannabinoid Regulation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cannabinoid Regulation vs sitewide
Cannabinoid Regulation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.