Topic summary

⁠29%1 analyzed article/video1,468 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Cancer Research results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 733 hits. Analysis detected 3,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (9,235 of 12,619 topics). This Cancer Research is better (less manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.

Cancer Research

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Survival Stories	1%
⁠0%	Pizza Oven	1%
⁠27%	Cancer Research (selected)	3%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 5,872

Article count: 1

Authors

Joseph Kim

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Cancer Research attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Cancer Research vs sitewide

Cancer Research attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Cancer disparities researchers say federal funding changes have disrupted their work⁠^27%

WAMU⁠^30%By Joseph Kim⁠^34%7/15/2026, 4:05:50 PM