Topic summary
87%1 analyzed article/video1,276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canadian Law results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 795 hits. Analysis detected 5,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 64% (4,784 of 13,257 topics). This Canadian Law is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Canadian Law
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Canadian Law attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Canadian Law vs sitewide
Canadian Law attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.