Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,534 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Campaign Finance Transparency results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,274 hits. Analysis detected 9,018 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (9,846 of 13,018 topics). This Campaign Finance Transparency is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.

Campaign Finance Transparency

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠25%	Campaign Finance Transparency (selected)	3%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 10,136

Article count: 1

Authors

Jonah Valdez

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Campaign Finance Transparency attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Campaign Finance Transparency vs sitewide

Campaign Finance Transparency attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

How Does TrackAIPAC Actually Track AIPAC?⁠^49%

The Intercept⁠^80%By Jonah Valdez⁠^0%3/26/2026, 9:57:00 AM