Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos4,076 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campaign Finance Reform results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 1,139 hits. Analysis detected 8,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,304 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 2% (12,793 of 13,018 topics). This Campaign Finance Reform is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
Campaign Finance Reform
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Campaign Finance Reform attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Campaign Finance Reform vs sitewide
Campaign Finance Reform attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.