Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Campaign Finance Law results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Slippery Slope, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 168 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,034 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,545 topics). This Campaign Finance Law is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Campaign Finance Law
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,034
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–10%
0.0%2%4%6%8%10%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%2%2%4%4%6%6%8%8%10%10%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos