Topic summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campaign Advertising results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Straw Man, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 287 hits. Analysis detected 2,286 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,764 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (11,231 of 21,634 topics). This Campaign Advertising is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Campaign Advertising
Topic details
Total words: 2,764
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos