Topic summary
72%1 analyzed article/video1,039 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cabinet Appointments results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 788 hits. Analysis detected 4,362 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (6,594 of 20,863 topics). This Cabinet Appointments is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Cabinet Appointments
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cabinet Appointments attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cabinet Appointments vs sitewide
Cabinet Appointments attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.