Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Budget Review results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 88 faulty-reasoning hits from 668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (7,332 of 21,674 topics). This Budget Review is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Budget Review
Topic details
Total words: 668
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles668 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos